Any doubts, concerns, questions, request for research materials, etc. are not only welcomed but strongly encouraged. There will be a lot of information on this site that is completely new to everyone, as it was for me when I began last November. This will be a very hard red pill to swallow and will have your brain in a constant state of denial or cognitive dissonance. Grasping the evil reality of what happened on this day will be very difficult. We all experienced it, but you must push through to the end. A person can not be forced to accept the truth, it must be discovered on their own.
To truly understand how the events of 9/11 unfolded, you must leave all of your preconceived notions or ideas about what happened behind you and start fresh from here. There were several new and different weapons involved. It was NOT “fire & jet fuel” nor was it “jews & thermite”. The truth is revealed here.
Due to the amount of information that is on this site, I think it’s best to begin with an outline of what happened. This way it’s your choice on whether or not to continue. Several new weapons were used on 9/11. The initial attack on the North Tower was a Raytheon built AGM 154 glide missile. The next attack on the South Tower was remotely piloted Boeing military aircraft with a hidden Boeing Defense and Space Group (Lockheed Martin) built AGM-86 missile. Both of these were designed and marketed as bunker busters for destroying chemical weapons, later to be used for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
An airborne mounted High Energy Laser Weapon System was used to heat the portions of the towers that were damaged by the previous explosions. The reason for this will be explained below. Finally, the real reason behind 9/11 and the true weapon being displayed was a 4th Generation Nuclear Weapon, which was what ultimately brought down WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7.
This was a world debut into the 4th Generation Nuclear Age of Weapons and Energy, in which the technological breakthrough of fast ignition fusion was finally achieved. The race for this technology began in the 1960’s and 9/11 was a display of who won the race. Inertial and Magnetic Confinement Fusion will be the bedrock of all the future energy produced throughout the world.
Richard Gage, Steven Jones and others at the top of this organization have been pulling this scam since 2004. This is a planned opposition group created by the same people responsible for 9/11. After people start losing interest because nothing is being accomplished, they simply change the name and come back with another round of fraud. This is to stir up a new wave of emotions from those that have been red-pilled to the lies of the jet fuel.
Controlled Demolition is the Psyop term created by the Deptartment of Defense and led by Richard Gage. His partner Barbara Honegger who is apart of Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, works for Department of Defense, the CIA and was a part of the MK Ultra Program at Stanford University.
He is known for his work on uranium-isotope separation for the Manhattan Project, as well as for founding the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Just 23 days after his death, the Regents of the University of California voted to rename two of the university’s nuclear research sites after Lawrence: the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. In the 1980s, Lawrence’s widow petitioned the University of California Board of Regents on several occasions to remove her husband’s name from the Livermore Laboratory, due to its focus on nuclear weapons Lawrence helped build, but was denied each time.
Edward Teller was a Hungarian-American theoretical physicist who is known colloquially as “the father of the hydrogen bomb”. He was a co-founder of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and was both its director and associate director for many years. Teller promoted increased defense spending to counter the perceived Soviet missile threat. He was a signatory to the 1958 report by the military sub-panel of the Rockefeller Brothers funded Special Studies Project, which called for a $3 billion annual increase in America’s military budget. Teller established the Department of Applied Science at the University of California, Davis and LLNL in 1963, which holds the Edward Teller endowed professorship in his honor. In 1975 he retired from both the lab and Berkeley, and was named Director Emeritus of the Livermore Laboratory and appointed Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution. He was awarded with the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George W. Bush in 2003, less than two months before his death.
Ray Kidder is an American physicist and nuclear weapons designer. He is best known for his outspoken views on nuclear weapons policy issues, including nuclear testing, stockpile management, and arms control. In 1960, Kidder worked with John Nuckolls and Stirling Colgate at Livermore to develop computer simulations for producing nuclear fusion in laser-compressed deuterium-tritium capsules. The results of this work led to Livermore’s laser fusion program in 1962, which Kidder was appointed the head of. This program used weapons-derived calculations in an attempt to make usable nuclear fusion sources. In 1979, Kidder was a witness for the defense in the United States v. The Progressive case, in which the U.S. Department of Energy sought to suppress the publication of a magazine article alleged to reveal the “secret of the hydrogen bomb”.
Kidder favored uncensored publication of the material, which had been compiled from unclassified sources, and claimed that Nobel Prize-winning physicist Hans Bethe had been misinformed when Bethe swore an affidavit in favor of censorship. Bethe and Kidder then engaged in a classified correspondence debating the issue. The correspondence was declassified in 2001. In 1997, Kidder argued against the Department of Energy’s Stockpile Stewardship and Management Program, calling it “misguided in a number of ways”, including introducing unnecessary changes in warhead materials, the cost of large-scale computational and experimental resources, and its effects on arms control efforts. He also criticized the building of the National Ignition Facility, saying it was not essential for stockpile stewardship.
He was the first director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory from 1952 to 1958. After leaving the laboratory in 1958, he held numerous positions in both government and academia, including the first Chief Scientist of the Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the first Director of Defense Research and Engineering.
The Senate confirmed Richardson to be Clinton’s Secretary of Energy on July 31, 1998. His tenure at the Department of Energy was marred by the Wen Ho Lee nuclear controversy. As told by The New York Times in a special report, a scientist later named as Dr. Lee at the Los Alamos National Laboratory was reported as a suspect who might have given nuclear secrets to the Chinese government. Richardson tightened security following the scandal, leading to the creation of the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA, not to be confused with the NSA and the NSC). This foreshadowed the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in reaction to the 9/11 attacks. Richardson also became the first Energy Secretary to implement a plan to dispose of nuclear waste.
Richardson also joined Kissinger McLarty Associates, a “strategic advisory firm” headed by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and former Clinton White House chief of staff Mack McLarty, as Senior Managing Director. From February 2001 to June 2002, he served on the board of directors of Peregrine Systems, Inc. He also served on the corporate boards of several energy companies, including Valero Energy Corporation and Diamond Offshore Drilling. He withdrew from these boards after being nominated by the Democratic Party for governor of New Mexico, but retained considerable stock holdings in Valero and Diamond Offshore. He would later sell these stocks during his campaign for President in 2007, saying he was “getting questions” about the propriety of these holdings, especially given his past as energy secretary, and that it had become a distraction.
The seismic activity documented on 9/11 was not an earthquake as a result of the collapsing towers. Naturally occurring earthquakes are the result of plate tectonics. Artificial or man-made “earthquakes” are produced by explosions and will generate seismic waves, which are measured by a seismograph to determine the level of intensity. Natural and artificial disturbances generate several different types of seismic waves, such as the P, or primary wave, and the S, or secondary wave. The differences between them allow scientists to measure the strength and location from where the wave was generated.
P waves travel faster than S waves, and are the first waves recorded by a seismograph in the event of a disturbance. P waves travel at speeds between 1 and 9 miles per second, while S waves travel significantly slower, between 1 and 5 miles per second. The S waves are the second wave to reach a seismic station measuring a disturbance. The difference in arrival times helps geologists determine the location of the earthquake.
Primary waves are made up of compression waves, also known as push-pull waves. The individual waves, therefore, push against one another, causing a constant parallel, straight motion. S waves are transverse waves, which means they vibrate up and down, perpendicular to the motion of the wave as they travel. In an S wave, particles travel up and down and the wave moves forward, like the image of a sine wave.
Due to the wave movement, P waves travel through any kind of material, whether it is a solid, liquid or gas. On the other hand, S waves only move through solids and are stopped by liquids and gases. For this reason, S waves are sometimes referred to as shear waves because they are unable to alter the volume of the material that they pass through. This also accounts why fewer S waves are recorded than P waves.
S waves are generally larger than P waves, causing much of the damage in an earthquake. Since the particles in an S wave move up and down, they move the earth around them with greater force, shaking the surface of the Earth. P waves, though easier to record, are significantly smaller and do not cause as much damage because they compress particles in only one direction.
The seismic data received by the monitoring stations on 9/11 shows that is NOT an earthquake at all. It was something much different. Here is the report by Seismologist Won-Young Kim as observed from the Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, just 21 miles north of Ground Zero.
Immediately he knew it was not an earthquake he was observing. He was very careful in the writing of this paper by not saying what he thought it was, but he did leave clues for others to figure out. “But in the present case we are in our own New York City area; that is, the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, in Palisades, N.Y.; and the context is inhuman actions against people and the fabric of our society” And he was not speaking about Muslim Terrorist here.
“It is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.”
The collapse of 7 WTC at 17:20:33 EDT was recorded but is not shown. Three other small signals shown in Figure 1 and ones at 12:07:38 and 12:10:03 EDT may have been generated by additional collapses
“The waves from the WTC events resemble those recorded by regional stations from the collapse of part of a salt mine in western New York on March 12, 1994 (ML 3.6). That source also lasted longer than that of a small earthquake. On the surface this means nothing, until you read the next part. A truck bomb at the WTC in 1993, in which approximately 0.5 tons of explosive were detonated, was not detected seismically, even at a station only 16 km away”
Did you catch the clues??? The WTC 1993 bombing did NOT produce any seismic waves that were detected at a station even closer to Manhattan than his observatory. He is telling us it was not explosives and that there is another station closer than his that must have recorded this event. So where is that data? For 18 years they have been telling us that Columbia was the closest one to receive the waves. So if its not explosives and not an earthquake, what could it be?
“Unfortunately, no seismic recordings of ground motion are currently known to exist at or very close to the WTC. Plans are pending for an Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS; see USGS ) that calls for increased urban seismic instrumentation, including New York City, and the September 11 events show that such instrumentation can be valuable to serve a purpose that sometimes transcends strict earthquake applications” See, he is still setting it up, like tangling a hook waiting for people to take a bite.
“It is more reasonable that most of the effects of those collapses on adjacent structures and people were related to the kinetic energy of falling debris and the pressure on buildings exerted by dust- and particle- laden air mobilized by falling debris. It had, except for temperature, an effect very similar to pyroclastic ash flows that descend slopes of volcanoes. The seismic shaking associated with the impacts and the main collapses probably was small compared to those other energetic processes. And this is where he reveals what caused it.
This interview done by Kim a couple days a later is more revealing.
Now back to the image comparing a real earthquake and what happened on 9/11. The units of measurement used in his report does not mean it was an earthquake, it means it was an Electromagnetic Wave.
9/11 was meant to be dramatic, but not too dramatic, so it wouldn’t arouse any suspicion that conflicts with their narrative. They wanted the buildings to fall, but needed to ensure other structures around the World Trade Centers would not be damaged. Earthquakes are rare, but they do happen in New York City. There was a 2.4 that hit the north side of Manhattan Island earlier that year on January 17. So the structures in that area are designed to withstand 4.0-4.5 earthquakes.
The largest earthquake in New York City was a 5.0-magnitude in August 1884. Centered off Queens’ Rockaway Beach and according to reports “opened crevices near the Brooklyn reservoir, rocked the Brooklyn Bridge and knocked down chimneys and cracking walls as far away as Pennsylvania.” So the largest one ever recorded in New York City made a crack in a lake and made a bridge built in the 1869 sway a little bit.
The AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) is the product of a joint venture between the United States Navy and Air Force to deploy a standardized medium range precision guided weapon, especially for engagement of defended targets from outside the range of standard anti-aircraft defenses, thereby increasing aircraft survivability and minimizing friendly losses.
The warhead of the AGM-154A consists of 145 BLU-97/B Combined Effects Bomb (CEB) submunitions. These bomblets have a shaped charge for armor defeating capability, a fragmenting case for material destruction, and a zirconium ring for incendiary effects. “Intermetallic Incendiary Warhead. NSWC defined and demonstrated a titanium-boron intermetallic, self-propagating, high-temperature, synthesis reaction warhead capable of generating a reactant cloud at 3700°C. The warhead releases extremely large amounts of energy, providing the means to incinerate a variety of targets. Its fire-start capability is such that, once initiated, the fire cannot be quenched. When water is employed to quench the fire, the reaction disassociates the water into hydrogen and oxygen, and a secondary reaction forming oxides of titanium and boron releases additional energy to enhance the firestorm capability of the warhead. The warhead has the ability to destroy aircraft shelters and conventional buildings and damage other targets and offers significant promise of neutralizing biological and chemical agents.”
The AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) is the product of a joint venture between the United States Navy and Air Force to deploy a standardized medium range precision guided weapon, especially for engagement of defended targets from outside the range of standard anti-aircraft defenses, thereby increasing aircraft survivability and minimizing friendly losses. Remember that erroneous “Blip” that came up on the flight radar temporarily?
Full rate production started on December 29, 1999. In June 2000 Raytheon was contracted to develop an enhanced electronics package for the JSOW to prevent electronic spoofing of GPS signals. This ultimately resulted in the JSOW Block II weapon, incorporating multiple cost reduction initiatives in addition to the Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM) capability. They used this technology in reverse and made it seem like the incoming missile was the AA11.
A GPS spoofing attack attempts to deceive a GPS receiver by broadcasting incorrect GPS signals, structured to resemble a set of normal GPS signals, or by rebroadcasting genuine signals captured elsewhere or at a different time. These spoofed signals may be modified in such a way as to cause the receiver to estimate its position to be somewhere other than where it actually is, or to be located where it is but at a different time, as determined by the attacker. One common form of a GPS spoofing attack, commonly termed a carry-off attack, begins by broadcasting signals synchronized with the genuine signals observed by the target receiver.
In addition, the AGM-154A-1 configuration is under development by Raytheon for FMS sales. This version replaces the submunition payload of the AGM-154A with a BLU-111 warhead to enhance blast-fragmentation effects without the unexploded ordnance (UXO) concerns with the BLU-97/B payload. The BLU-97/B Combined Effects Bomb is the submunition used in several cluster bomb type weapon systems.
When the bomblets fall, they separate from the main bomb and independently free fall to the ground. They contain an inflatable bag (ballute) on the top of them, which slows them down and spreads them out. Once the bomblets reach a force of 6 Gs they arm themselves.
The Naudet video of the North Tower strike was staged. He lined up his shot before it happened.
Here is what the video looked like before and after the NIST did their “enhancements”
In this false color video clip, you can see how the area between the buildings has been blurred out.
In this false color video clip, you can see how the area between the buildings has been blurred out and there is NO airplane. The missile is going too fast so all you see is the explosion.
The Plavel video of the North Tower strike was also staged so they could digitally add the airplane in later.
He was 2.23 miles away and just randomly panned over to catch the impact. First, the airplane would not appear that large as seen from that distance and second, the digitally added the smoke from the explosion doesn’t match the view from the Naudet video.
The flash seen before the missile impacts the building is not an explosion, it’s the condensation cloud produced from the bay doors opening.
Here is a video showing the launch and detonation of an AGM 154 missile.